4.4 Article

Adherence to bisphosphonates in the general population: a study in patients referred to a primary care service

Journal

ARCHIVES OF OSTEOPOROSIS
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s11657-019-0593-2

Keywords

Bisphosphonates; Adherence; Primary care; General practitioners

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeThe aim of the study was to evaluate the adherence to treatment with bisphosphonates in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis referred to a primary care clinic.MethodsA total of 7257 outpatients were referred to the primary care service where the study was conducted. We retrieved data of postmenopausal women to which bisphosphonates have been prescribed in the period January 1, 2000-December 31, 2014, and analyzed the group of patients who had discontinued the drug.ResultsThe total number of women treated with bisphosphonates was 285 (mean age 729.8years). At the time the data were retrieved, 157 (55% of the total) had discontinued therapy. Among them, 119 (41.7%) agreed to participate in the study. They reported the following reasons for treatment discontinuation: withdrawal by another physician (40%), lack of motivation (20%), absence of BMD improvement (14%), uncomfortable way of drug administration (11%), side effects (6%), fear of side effects (1.6%), high number of concomitant medications (0.8%), and others (6.6%). Sixty patients (50.4%) discontinued therapy within 2years, 27 patients (23%) >2 and 5years and 32 (27%) after 5years.Conclusions Our study demonstrates that more than half of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis referred to a primary care service discontinued bisphosphonates before the clinical effect can be seen and mostly because of advice by physicians not initially prescribing the drug. There is an inappropriate management of bisphosphonate therapy in terms of therapeutic efficacy and strategies aimed at ameliorating clinical management of osteoporosis patients are warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available