4.2 Article

Psycholinguistic variables in visual word recognition and pronunciation of European Portuguese words: a mega-study approach

Journal

LANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages 689-719

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2019.1578395

Keywords

European Portuguese; megastudy; psycholinguistic variables; lexical decision; naming

Funding

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology
  2. Portuguese Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education
  3. FEDER through COMPETE2020 under the PT2020 Partnership Agreement [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007653]
  4. research project Procura Palavras (P-Pal): A software program for deriving objective and subjective psycholinguistic indices for European Portuguese words [PTDC/PSI-PCO/104679/2008]
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/PSI-PCO/104679/2008] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An increasing number of psycholinguistic studies have adopted a megastudy approach to explore the role that different variables play in the speed and/or accuracy with which words are recognised and/or pronounced in different languages. However, despite evidence for deep and shallow orthographies, little is known about the role that several orthographic, phonological and semantic variables play in visual word recognition and word production of words from intermediate-depth languages, as European Portuguese (EP). The current study aimed to overcome this gap, by collecting lexical decision and naming data for a large pool of words selected to closely represent the diversity of the EP language. Results from multiple regression analyses conducted on the latency data from both tasks place EP in-between the results previously observed in other deep- and shallow-orthographies. These findings indicate that EP represents a pivotal language to study the universality of the processes/mechanisms involved in skilled reading across languages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available