4.1 Article

Highly Satisfied Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients Display a Wide Range of Soft Tissue Balance

Journal

JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages 247-254

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1677873

Keywords

total knee arthroplasty; ligament balance; posterior stabilized; highly satisfied

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soft tissue balancing while crucial for a successful total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is incompletely defined and the subject of broad recommendations. We analyzed 69 unilateral computer-assisted surgery posterior stabilized (PS) TKA subjects who postoperatively scored >= 36 out of a possible 40 points on the satisfaction section of the American Knee Society score (2011). We examined a range of postoperative coronal plane laxity parameters and the correlation between preoperative and postoperative laxity. Total postoperative coronal laxity arcs at maximum extension and 20 degrees of flexion varied between 2 and 12 and 3 and 13 degrees, respectively. Depending on the position of measurement, medial laxity was between 0.5 and 9.5 degrees and lateral laxity between 1 and 12 degrees. The change in laxity between maximum extension and 90 degrees of flexion demonstrated a range of 7 degrees medially and 12 degrees laterally. The total coronal arc of movement did not affect functional outcomes. A moderate correlation of 0.452 and 0.424 was seen between initial and postoperative total coronal laxity arcs in maximum extension and 20 degrees of flexion, respectively. The individual variability for each measured parameter within our cohort demonstrates TKA satisfaction is not as simple as producing a narrow range of coronal laxity parameters and that as with many body systems considerable variation is still consistent with excellent function. Our findings help to define acceptable balance parameters for PS TKA. It does not appear necessary to closely match postoperative laxity to that present preoperatively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available