4.1 Article

Variation in prostate surgery costs and outcomes in the USA: robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy

Journal

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages 143-155

Publisher

FUTURE MEDICINE LTD
DOI: 10.2217/cer-2018-0109

Keywords

comparative effectiveness; cost disparity; costs; length of stay; National Inpatient Sample; open radical prostatectomy; operative outcomes; prostate cancer; robot-assisted prostatectomy; treatment cost

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: To compare perioperative complications, inpatient cost and length of stay between robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and open radical prostatectomy (ORP) using National Inpatient Sample data from 2010 to 2015. Patients & methods: A total of 69,009 records with RARP or ORP were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression and generalized linear models. Results: The RARP had superior perioperative outcomes at a higher cost (adjusted mean difference=2956; 95% CI: $2822-$3090) and shorter length of stay (mean difference=0.85; 95% CI: 0.81-0.89) compared with ORP. Mean cost of RARP was lowest in urban teaching, private invest-own, high volume and northeast region hospitals and highest for black men. Conclusion: Compared with ORP, RARP had significantly better perioperative outcomes at a higher cost.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available