4.6 Article

Identification of Genes Involved in Low Temperature-Induced Senescence of Panicle Leaf in Litchi chinensis

Journal

GENES
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/genes10020111

Keywords

panicle leaf; senescence; transcriptome; litchi; low temperature

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31772249]
  2. National Litchi and Longan Research System [CARS-33]
  3. Guangdong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [2017A03013161]
  4. Innovation Team Project of the Department of Education of Guangdong Province [2016KCXTD 011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Warm winters and hot springs may promote panicle leaf growing and repress floral development. To identify genes potentially involved in litchi panicle leaf senescence, eight RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) libraries of the senescing panicle leaves under low temperature (LT) conditions and the developing panicle leaves under high temperature (HT) conditions were constructed. For each library, 4.78-8.99 x 10(6) clean reads were generated. Digital expression of the genes was compared between the senescing and developing panicle leaves. A total of 6477 upregulated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (from developing leaves to senescing leaves), and 6318 downregulated DEGs were identified, 158 abscisic acid (ABA)-, 68 ethylene-, 107 indole-3-acetic acid (IAA)-, 27 gibberellic acid (GA)-, 68 cytokinin (CTK)-, 37 salicylic acid (SA)-, and 23 brassinolide (BR)-related DEGs. Confirmation of the RNA-Seq data by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis suggested that expression trends of the 10 candidate genes using qRT-PCR were similar to those revealed by RNA-Seq, and a significantly positive correlation between the obtained data from qRT-PCR and RNA-Seq were found, indicating the reliability of our RNA-Seq data. The present studies provided potential genes for the future molecular breeding of new cultivars that can induce panicle leaf senescence and reduce floral abortion under warm climates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available