4.5 Article

Diffusion MRI Indices and Their Relation to Cognitive Impairment in Brain Aging: The Updated Multi-protocol Approach in ADNI3

Journal

FRONTIERS IN NEUROINFORMATICS
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2019.00002

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; ADNI3; white matter; DTI; multi-site; harmonization; TDF; ComBat

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [U01 AG024904]
  2. DOD (Department of Defense) [W81XWH-12-2-0012]
  3. National Institute on Aging (NIA) [RF1 AG04191, P01 AG026572-13, R56AG058854, RF1AG051710, P41 EB015922]
  4. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
  5. AbbVie
  6. Alzheimer's Association
  7. Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation
  8. Araclon Biotech
  9. BioClinica, Inc.
  10. Biogen
  11. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
  12. CereSpir, Inc.
  13. Cogstate
  14. Eisai Inc.
  15. Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  16. Eli Lilly and Company
  17. EuroImmun
  18. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
  19. Genentech, Inc.
  20. Fujirebio
  21. GE Healthcare
  22. IXICO Ltd.
  23. Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy Research and Development, LLC.
  24. Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development LLC.
  25. Lumosity
  26. Lundbeck
  27. Merck and Co., Inc.
  28. Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC.
  29. NeuroRx Research
  30. Neurotrack Technologies
  31. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
  32. Pfizer Inc.
  33. Piramal Imaging
  34. Servier
  35. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company
  36. Transition Therapeutics
  37. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  38. NIA [U24 AG21886]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Brain imaging with diffusion-weighted MRI (dMRI) is sensitive to microstructural white matter (WM) changes associated with brain aging and neurodegeneration. In its third phase, the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI3) is collecting data across multiple sites and scanners using different dMRI acquisition protocols, to better understand disease effects. It is vital to understand when data can be pooled across scanners, and how the choice of dMRI protocol affects the sensitivity of extracted measures to differences in clinical impairment. Here, we analyzed ADNI3 data from 317 participants (mean age: 75.4 +/- 7.9 years; 143 men/174 women), who were each scanned at one of 47 sites with one of six dMRI protocols using scanners from three different manufacturers. We computed four standard diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) indices including fractional anisotropy (FA(DTI)) and mean, radial, and axial diffusivity, and one FA index based on the tensor distribution function (FA(TDF)), in 24 bilaterally averaged WM regions of interest. We found that protocol differences significantly affected dMRI indices, in particular FA(DTI). We ranked the diffusion indices for their strength of association with four clinical assessments. In addition to diagnosis, we evaluated cognitive impairment as indexed by three commonly used screening tools for detecting dementia and AD: the AD Assessment Scale (ADAS-cog), the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and the Clinical Dementia Rating scale sum-of-boxes (CDR-sob). Using a nested random-effects regression model to account for protocol and site, we found that across all dMRI indices and clinical measures, the hippocampal-cingulum and fornix (crus)/stria terminalis regions most consistently showed strong associations with clinical impairment. Overall, the greatest effect sizes were detected in the hippocampal-cingulum (CGH) and uncinate fasciculus (UNC) for associations between axial or mean diffusivity and CDR-sob. FA(TDF )detected robust widespread associations with clinical measures, while FA(DTI) was the weakest of the five indices for detecting associations. Ultimately, we were able to successfully pool dMRI data from multiple acquisition protocols from ADNI3 and detect consistent and robust associations with clinical impairment and age.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available