4.4 Article

Perturbativity constraints on U(1)B-L and left-right models and implications for heavy gauge boson searches

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP01(2019)208

Keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Neutrino Physics

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy [DE-SC0017987]
  2. US National Science Foundation [PHY1620074]
  3. HKUST Jockey Club Institute for Advanced Study, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
  4. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0017987] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We derive perturbativity constraints on beyond standard model scenarios with extra gauge groups, such as SU(2) or U(1), whose generators contribute to the electric charge, and show that there are both upper and lower limits on the additional gauge couplings, from the requirement that the couplings remain perturbative up to the grand unification theory (GUT) scale. This leads to stringent constraints on the masses of the corresponding gauge bosons and their collider phenomenology. We specifically focus on the models based on SULxU1I3RxUB-L and the left-right symmetric models based on SU(2)(L)xSU(2)(R)xU(1)(B-L), and discuss the implications of the perturbativity constraints for new gauge boson searches at current and future colliders. In particular, we find that the stringent flavor constraints in the scalar sector of left-right model set a lower bound on the right-handed scale v(R) 10 TeV, if all the gauge and quartic couplings are to remain perturbative up to the GUT scale. This precludes the prospects of finding the Z(R) boson in the left-right model at the LHC, even in the high-luminosity phase, and leaves only a narrow window for the W-R boson. A much broader allowed parameter space, with the right-handed scale v(R) up to similar or equal to 87 TeV, could be probed at the future 100 TeV collider.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available