4.7 Article

Evaluation of the Magicplex™ Sepsis Real-Time Test for the Rapid Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections in Adults

Journal

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00056

Keywords

bloodstream infection; PCR-based assay; blood culture; Magicplex (TM) Sepsis test; infection; sepsis

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  2. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) A Way to Achieve Europe
  3. Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases [REIPI RD12/0015]
  4. Departament d'Universitats, Recerca i Societat de la Informacio of the Generalitat de Catalunya [2014SGR653]
  5. Innovative Medicines Initiative (COMBACTE) [115523]
  6. Ciber de Enfermedades Respiratorias [CibeRes CB06/06/0028]
  7. 2009 Support to Research Groups of Catalonia 911
  8. IDIBAPS (CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya)
  9. postdoctoral grant (Strategic Plan for Research and Innovation in Health - PERIS 2016-2020)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sepsis is a serious health condition worldwide, affecting more than 30 million people globally each year. Blood culture (BC) is generally used to diagnose sepsis because of the low quantity of microbes occurring in the blood during such infections. However, similar to 50% of bloodstream infections (BSI) give negative BC, this figure being higher for sepsis, which delays the start of appropriate antimicrobial therapy. This prospective study evaluated a multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction, the Magicplex (TM) Sepsis test (MP), for the detection of pathogens from whole blood, comparing it to routine BC. We analyzed 809 blood samples from 636 adult patients, with 132/809 (16.3%) of the samples positive for one or more relevant microorganism according to BC and/or MP. The sensitivity and specificity of MP were 29 and 95%, respectively, while the level of agreement between BC and MP was 87%. The rate of contaminated samples was higher for BC (10%) than MP (4.8%) (P < 0.001). Patients with only MP-positive samples were more likely to be on antimicrobial treatment (47%) than those with only BC-positive samples (18%) (P = 0.002). In summary, the MP test could be useful in some clinical setting, such as among patients on antibiotic therapy. Nevertheless, a low sensitivity demonstrated impairs its use as a part of a routine diagnostic algorithm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available