4.6 Article

Effects of Degree of Polymerization on Size, Crystal Structure, and Digestibility of Debranched Starch Nanoparticles and Their Enhanced Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities of Curcumin

Journal

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages 8499-8511

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b00290

Keywords

debranched starch; nanoparticles; in vitro digestion; antioxidant activity; stability; cytotoxicity

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC1602101]
  2. National First-Class Discipline Program of Food Science and Technology [JUFSTR20180203]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The versatility of debranched starch nanoparticles (DBS-NPs) has attracted considerable attention from the food, agricultural, and cosmetic industries. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of DBSs with low (DP < 10), moderate (10 > DP < 20), and high (20 > DP < 25) DPs (where DP represents the degree of polymerization), as well as reaction temperatures (25, 60, and 90 degrees C) on size, morphology, crystal structure, and digestibility of the refined DBS-NPs via nanoprecipitation. Spherical DBS-NPs with a controlled size of 40-200 nm were obtained; no nanoparticles were observed when the average DP was <10. The relative crystallinity increased from 11.1% to 71.6% as the increasing the average DP increased. When the microsized DBSs were converted to nanoscale DBSs, the rapidly digestible starch levels of the DBS-NPs decreased, and the DBS-NPs showed remarkable increase in the sum of slowly digestible starch and resistant starch contents, compared to the responding DBS. Furthermore, the maximum encapsulation efficiency of curcumin in DBS-NPs reached up to 92.49%. The antioxidant and antibacterial activities of curcumins in DBS-NPs were enhanced significantly, and their antioxidant stability was improved markedly when exposed to UV light or heat treatments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available