Journal
WATER
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages -Publisher
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w11030621
Keywords
photocatalysis; semi-passive; anodization; buoyant catalyst; 2; 4-D; LED; mesh
Categories
Funding
- CMC Research Institutes
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
- MITACS
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In this study, the relative efficiency of four forms of supported titanium dioxide (TiO2) as a photocatalyst to degrade 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) in KillexA (R), a commercially available herbicide was studied. Coated glass spheres, anodized plate, anodized mesh, and electro-photocatalysis using the anodized mesh were evaluated under an ultraviolet - light-emitting diode (UV-LED) light source at lambda = 365 nm in a semi-passive mode. Energy consumption of the system was used to compare the efficiency of the photocatalysts. The results showed both photospheres and mesh consumed approximately 80 J/cm(3) energy followed by electro-photocatalysis (112.2 J/cm(3)), and the anodized plate (114.5 J/cm(3)). Although electro-photocatalysis showed the fastest degradation rate (K = 5.04 mg L-1 h(-1)), its energy consumption was at the same level as the anodized plate with a lower degradation rate constant of 3.07 mg L-1 h(-1). The results demonstrated that three-dimensional nanotubes of TiO2 surrounding the mesh provide superior degradation compared to one-dimensional arrays on the planar surface of the anodized plate. With limited broad-scale comparative studies between varieties of different TiO2 supports, this study provides a comparative analysis of relative degradation efficiencies between the four photocatalytic configurations.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available