4.2 Article

Preparation and electrical conductivity of graphitic carbon-infused copper alloys

Journal

MRS COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 137-143

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1557/mrc.2019.12

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy (DOE), Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Advanced Manufacturing Office [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  2. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  3. Argonne, a US Department of Energy Office of Science laboratory [DE-AC02-06CH11357]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By electron-beam (e-beam) melting. we prepared 0.4 wt% carbon-infused copper (CuCv4), and a copper control without carbon addition (CuCv0). Scanning electron microscopy and helium ion microscopy (HIM) were performed on the as-solidified surface, fracture surface, and ion-polished surface of the CuCv4 sample. The results revealed that graphitic carbon flakes cover the as-solidified surface, and carbon nanoparticles and clusters exist in the fracture and ion-polished surfaces. HIM on the ion-polished surface revealed a unique ripple-shaped feature, which is possibly associated with the infusion of carbon nanoribbons in the copper matrix. The bulk densities were measured to be 8.86 and 8.53 g/cm(3), which correspond to relative densities of 98.9% and 96.4% for the CuCv0 and CuCv4 samples, respectively. In addition, apparent electrical conductivities were measured to be 56.9 and 57.5 MS/m, respectively, for the e-beam melted CuCv0 and CuCv4 samples. These values correspond to true electrical conductivities of 100.5% IACS (International Annealed Copper Standard) and 107.4% IACS after correction for the porosity. Our results reveal remarkable promise of using covetic copper for the next generation conductors in energy applications from microelectronic devices to high-power transmission cables.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available