4.6 Article

Links Between Metabolic and Structural Changes in the Brain of Cognitively Normal Older Adults: A 4-Year Longitudinal Follow-Up

Journal

FRONTIERS IN AGING NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00015

Keywords

aging; brain energy metabolism; cognition; glucose; insulin resistance; ketones

Funding

  1. Fonds de recherche QuebecSante
  2. NSERC
  3. Canada Research Chairs Secretariat
  4. Universite de Sherbrooke Research Chair

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We aimed to longitudinally assess the relationship between changing brain energy metabolism (glucose and acetoacetate) and cognition during healthy aging. Participants aged 71 +/- 5 year underwent cognitive evaluation and quantitative positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans at baseline (N = 25) and two (N = 25) and four (N = 16) years later. During the follow-up, the rate constant for brain extraction of glucose (K-glc) declined by 6%-12% mainly in the temporo-parietal lobes and cingulate gyri (p <= 0.05), whereas brain acetoacetate extraction (Kacac) and utilization remained unchanged in all brain regions (p >= 0.06). Over the 4 years, cognitive results remained within the normal age range but an age-related decline was observed in processing speed. K-glc , in the caudate was directly related to performance on several cognitive tests (r = +0.41 to +0.43, all p <= 0.04). Peripheral insulin resistance assessed by the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was significantly inversely related to K-glc , in the thalamus (r = -0.44, p = 0.04) and in the caudate (r = -0.43, p = 0.05), and also inversely related to executive function, attention and processing speed (r = -0.45 to -0.53, all p <= 0.03). We confirm in a longitudinal setting that the age-related decline in K-glc is directly associated with declining performance on some tests of cognition but does not significantly affect Kacac.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available