4.7 Article

Multiple roles for Vitamin B6 in plant acclimation to UV-B

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-38053-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. New National Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities [UNKP-17-3-III-PTE-229]
  2. Knowledge Foundation
  3. Swedish Research Council FORMAS
  4. Orebro University's Faculty for Business, Science and Technology
  5. Janos Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
  6. European Social Fund [EFOP-3.6.1.-16-2016-00004]
  7. European Union

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Direct and indirect roles of vitamin B-6 in leaf acclimation to supplementary UV-B radiation are shown in vitamin B-6 deficient Arabidopsis thaliana mutant rsr4-1 and C24 wild type. Responses to 4 days of 3.9 kJ m(-2) d(-1) biologically effective UV-B dose were compared in terms of leaf photochemistry, vitamer content, and antioxidant enzyme activities; complemented with a comprehensive study of vitamer ROS scavenging capacities. Under UV-B, rsr4-1 leaves lost more (34%) photochemical yield than C24 plants (24%). In the absence of UV-B, rsr4-1 leaves contained markedly less pyridoxal-5'-phosphate (PLP) than C24 ones, but levels increased up to the C24 contents in response to UV-B. Activities of class-III ascorbate and glutathione peroxidases increased in C24 leaves upon the UV-B treatment but not in the rsr4-1 mutant. SOD activities remained the same in C24 but decreased by more than 50% in rsr4-1 under UV-B. Although PLP was shown to be an excellent antioxidant in vitro, our results suggest that the UV-B protective role of B-6 vitamers is realized indirectly, via supporting peroxidase defence rather than by direct ROS scavenging. We hypothesize that the two defence pathways are linked through the PLP-dependent biosynthesis of cystein and heme, affecting peroxidases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available