4.7 Article

Dynamics of soil microbial communities following vegetation succession in a karst mountain ecosystem, Southwest China

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36886-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41461072, 41601249, 41661045]
  2. Science and Technology Cooperation Plan of Guizhou Province [[2018]5609]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interaction between soil property and soil microbial community in karst area still remains an open question. The characteristics of soil physicochemical properties and microbial community structure and their relationship under five vegetation succession stages (grassland, shrub land, secondary forest, plantation forest, and natural forest) at two soil depths (0-10cm and 10-20 cm) were explored in a karst mountain ecosystem. We found that soil moisture content (SMC) and pH increased with soil depth across vegetation succession. The highest content of soil nutrients was found in the natural forest stage at both soil depths. The total PLFAs, the abundance of Gram-positive (GP) bacteria, actinomycetes (ACT), fungi, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) were significantly (P < 0.05) related to variations with soil total carbon (TC) and total nitrogen (TN). Furthermore, the distribution of soil microbial community distinctly differed in vegetation succession both at two soil layers which was demonstrated by Principal-coordinates analysis. Redundancy analyses patterns indicated that soil TC and TN were positively related to cy19:0 and 10Me 16:0, but an opposite relationship with a15:0. Changes of soil microbial communities were significantly determined by vegetation succession, and soil microbial community structure can be a sensitive indicator to reflect the stabilization of karst mountain ecosystem, southwest of China.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available