4.7 Article

High-resolution atmospheric-pressure MALDI mass spectrometry imaging workflow for lipidomic analysis of late fetal mouse lungs

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-39452-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) [91566181]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [Sp 314/13-1]
  3. Medical Faculty of Justus Liebig University Giessen, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) provides label-free, non-targeted molecular and spatial information of the biomolecules within tissue. Lipids play important roles in lung biology, e.g. as surfactant, preventing alveolar collapse during normal and forced respiration. Lipidomic characterization of late fetal mouse lungs at day 19 of gestation (E19) has not been performed yet. In this study we employed high-resolution atmospheric pressure scanning microprobe matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization MSI for the lipidomic analysis of E19 mouse lungs. Molecular species of different lipid classes were imaged in E19 lung sections at high spatial and mass resolution in positive-and negative-ion mode. Lipid species were characterized based on accurate mass and on-tissue tandem mass spectrometry. In addition, a dedicated sample preparation protocol, homogenous deposition of matrices on tissue surfaces and data processing parameters were optimized for the comparison of signal intensities of lipids between different tissue sections of E19 lungs of wild type and Pex11 beta-knockout mice. Our study provides lipid information of E19 mouse lungs, optimized experimental and data processing strategies for the direct comparison of signal intensities of metabolites (lipids) among the tissue sections from MSI experiments. To best of our knowledge, this is the first MSI and lipidomic study of E19 mouse lungs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available