4.1 Article

Racial differences within subsets of Sudden Unexpected Infant Death (SUID) with an emphasis on asphyxia

Journal

JOURNAL OF FORENSIC AND LEGAL MEDICINE
Volume 62, Issue -, Pages 52-55

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2019.01.003

Keywords

SUID; SIDS; Asphyxia; Sudden infant death race suffocation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Sudden Unexpected Infant Deaths (SUID) is defined as a combination of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), Unknown Cause of Death (UCD) and Accidental Suffocation and Strangulation in Bed (ASSB). Overall rates from 2000 to 2015 have been trending down. Racial differences in occurrence are seen. Study design and setting: Using the CDC Wonder Database, the total rates of SUID and its subsets were examined. Results: Non-Caucasian infant death rates for the total SUID group, and the SIDS component, are trending downward significantly faster than for Caucasians. UCD trends in rates show an apparent small, non-significant, decline for non-Caucasians, and are unchanged for Caucasians. ASSB rates are trending upward slightly more rapidly (not significantly) for non-Caucasians than Caucasians. Conclusion: The trend showing ASSB trending upward more in non-Caucasians than Caucasians may suggest 1) A racial difference that certifiers are more willing to certify SIDS than ASSB in Caucasians, and/or 2) Certifiers are biased towards certifying more ASSB than SIDS in non-Caucasians, and/or 3) Asphyxia risks may be increasing more in non-Caucasian SUIDs. Option #1 would require educational efforts to recognize the asphyxia risks in Caucasians. Option #2 would require documentation of racial bias in infant death certification followed by efforts to reduce the bias. Option #3 would require focused targeting of non-Caucasian populations to reduce asphyxia risks. Potentially all three scenarios could co-exist.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available