4.0 Article

Quantitative Comparison of Enrichment from DNA-Encoded Chemical Library Selections

Journal

ACS COMBINATORIAL SCIENCE
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 75-82

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscombsci.8b00116

Keywords

DNA-encoded libraries; data analysis; drug discovery; affinity selection

Funding

  1. Welch Foundation [Q-0042]
  2. Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) [RP160805]
  3. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1160866]
  4. National Institutes of Health from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [P01HD087157]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

DNA-encoded chemical libraries (DELs) provide a high-throughput and cost-effective route for screening billions of unique molecules for binding affinity for diverse protein targets. Identifying candidate compounds from these libraries involves affinity selection, DNA sequencing, and measuring enrichment in a sample pool of DNA barcodes. Successful detection of potent binders is affected by many factors, including selection parameters, chemical yields, library amplification, sequencing depth, sequencing errors, library sizes, and the chosen enrichment metric. To date, there has not been a clear consensus about how enrichment from DEL selections should be measured or reported. We propose a normalized z-score enrichment metric using a binomial distribution model that satisfies important criteria that are relevant for analysis of DEL selection data. The introduced metric is robust with respect to library diversity and sampling and allows for quantitative comparisons of enrichment of n-synthons from parallel DEL selections. These features enable a comparative enrichment analysis strategy that can provide valuable information about hit compounds in early stage drug discovery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available