4.8 Article

Uncertainty in ensembles of global biodiversity scenarios

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09519-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Technical Support Unit of the IPBES for the Expert Group on Models and Scenarios
  2. ERA-Net BiodivERsA - Belmont Forum
  3. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche [ANR-18-EBI4-0009, ANR-15-IDEX-02]
  4. Swiss National Foundation, part of the 2018 Joint call BiodivERsA-Belmont Forum call (project 'FutureWeb') [20BD21_ 184131/1]
  5. SNF/ANR grant [310030L-170059/ANR-16-CE93-004]
  6. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-18-EBI4-0009] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While there is a clear demand for scenarios that provide alternative states in biodiversity with respect to future emissions, a thorough analysis and communication of the associated uncertainties is still missing. Here, we modelled the global distribution of similar to 11,500 amphibian, bird and mammal species and project their climatic suitability into the time horizon 2050 and 2070, while varying the input data used. By this, we explore the uncertainties originating from selecting species distribution models (SDMs), dispersal strategies, global circulation models (GCMs), and representative concentration pathways (RCPs). We demonstrate the overwhelming influence of SDMs and RCPs on future biodiversity projections, followed by dispersal strategies and GCMs. The relative importance of each component varies in space but also with the selected sensitivity metrics and with species' range size. Overall, this means using multiple SDMs, RCPs, dispersal assumptions and GCMs is a necessity in any biodiversity scenario assessment, to explicitly report associated uncertainties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available