4.8 Article

A stem group echinoderm from the basal Cambrian of China and the origins of Ambulacraria

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09059-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Young Thousand Talents Plan of China
  2. Swedish Research Council [2017-05183, VR2016-04610]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economics, Finance and Competitiveness [CGL2017-87631-P]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41425008, 41621003, 41720104002, 41772002, 41472015]
  5. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB26000000]
  6. 111 project [D17013]
  7. Swedish Research Council [2017-05183] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Deuterostomes are a morphologically disparate clade, encompassing the chordates (including vertebrates), the hemichordates (the vermiform enteropneusts and the colonial tube-dwelling pterobranchs) and the echinoderms (including starfish). Although deuterostomes are considered monophyletic, the inter-relationships between the three clades remain highly contentious. Here we report, Yanjiahella biscarpa, a bilaterally symmetrical, solitary metazoan from the early Cambrian (Fortunian) of China with a characteristic echinoderm-like plated theca, a muscular stalk reminiscent of the hemichordates and a pair of feeding appendages. Our phylogenetic analysis indicates that Y. biscarpa is a stem-echinoderm and not only is this species the oldest and most basal echinoderm, but it also predates all known hemichordates, and is among the earliest deuterostomes. This taxon confirms that echinoderms acquired plating before pentaradial symmetry and that their history is rooted in bilateral forms. Yanjiahella biscarpa shares morphological similarities with both enteropneusts and echinoderms, indicating that the enteropneust body plan is ancestral within hemichordates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available