4.8 Article

Loss of BCL9/9l suppresses Wnt driven tumourigenesis in models that recapitulate human cancer

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-08586-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Cancer Research UK [C596/A17196, A12481, A21139]
  2. ERC [311301]
  3. Wellcome Trust [WT107492Z]
  4. European Research Council MSCA fellowship [659666]
  5. MRC doctoral training grant [MR/J50032x/1]
  6. MRC Clinical Research Training Fellowship [MR/N021800/1]
  7. MRC [MR/N021800/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [659666] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)
  9. European Research Council (ERC) [311301] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Different thresholds of Wnt signalling are thought to drive stem cell maintenance, regeneration, differentiation and cancer. However, the principle that oncogenic Wnt signalling could be specifically targeted remains controversial. Here we examine the requirement of BCL9/9l, constituents of the Wnt-enhanceosome, for intestinal transformation following loss of the tumour suppressor APC. Although required for Lgr5+ intestinal stem cells and regeneration, Bcl9/9l deletion has no impact upon normal intestinal homeostasis. Loss of BCL9/9l suppressed many features of acute APC loss and subsequent Wnt pathway deregulation in vivo. This resulted in a level of Wnt pathway activation that favoured tumour initiation in the proximal small intestine (SI) and blocked tumour growth in the colon. Furthermore, Bcl9/9l deletion completely abrogated beta-catenin driven intestinal and hepatocellular transformation. We speculate these results support the just-right hypothesis of Wnt-driven tumour formation. Importantly, loss of BCL9/9l is particularly effective at blocking colonic tumourigenesis and mutations that most resemble those that occur in human cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available