4.8 Article

2600-years of stratospheric volcanism through sulfate isotopes

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-08357-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. LEFE-IMAGO, a scientific program of the Institut National des Sciences de l'Univers (INSU/CNRS)
  2. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [NT09-431976-VOLSOL]
  3. Labex OSUG@2020 [ANR10 LABX56]
  4. Fondation BNP-Paribas under the EAIIST project
  5. Institut Polaire Francais Paul-Emile Victor (IPEV) [1011]
  6. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI [16H05884, 18H05050, 25887025, 17H06105]
  7. JSPS
  8. CNRS
  9. Fulbright commission
  10. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18H05050, 25887025] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High quality records of stratospheric volcanic eruptions, required to model past climate variability, have been constructed by identifying synchronous (bipolar) volcanic sulfate horizons in Greenland and Antarctic ice cores. Here we present a new 2600-year chronology of stratospheric volcanic events using an independent approach that relies on isotopic signatures (Delta S-33 and in some cases Delta O-17) of ice core sulfate from five closely-located ice cores from Dome C, Antarctica. The Dome C stratospheric reconstruction provides independent validation of prior reconstructions. The isotopic approach documents several high-latitude stratospheric events that are not bipolar, but climatically-relevant, and diverges deeper in the record revealing tropospheric signals for some previously assigned bipolar events. Our record also displays a collapse of the Delta O-17 anomaly of sulfate for the largest volcanic eruptions, showing a further change in atmospheric chemistry induced by large emissions. Thus, the refinement added by considering both isotopic and bipolar correlation methods provides additional levels of insight for climate-volcano connections and improves ice core volcanic reconstructions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available