4.7 Article

Type 3 inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor has antiapoptotic and proliferative role in cancer cells

Journal

CELL DEATH & DISEASE
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41419-019-1433-4

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. [APVV-16-0246]
  2. [VEGA 2/0082/16]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although the involvement of type 1 (IP(3)R1) and type 2 (IP(3)R2) inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors in apoptosis induction has been well documented in different cancer cells and tissues, the function of type 3 IP3R (IP(3)R3) is still elusive. Therefore, in this work we focused on the role of IP(3)R3 in tumor cells in vitro and in vivo. We determined increased expression of this receptor in clear cell renal cell carcinoma compared to matched unaffected part of the kidney from the same patient. Thus, we hypothesized about different functions of IP(3)R3 compared to IP(3)R1 and IP(3)R2 in tumor cells. Silencing of IP(3)R1 prevented apoptosis induction in colorectal cancer DLD1 cells, ovarian cancer A2780 cells, and clear cell renal cell carcinoma RCC4 cells, compared to apoptosis in cells treated with scrambled siRNA. As expected, silencing of IP(3)R3 and subsequent apoptosis induction resulted in increased levels of apoptosis in all these cells. Further, we prepared a DLD1/IP(3)R3_del cell line using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing method. These cells were injected into nude mice and tumor's volume was compared with tumors induced by DLD1 cells. Lower volume of tumors originated from DLD1/IP(3)R3_del cells was observed after 12 days, compared to wild type DLD1 cells. Also, the migration of these cells was lesser compared to wild type DLD1 cells. Apoptosis under hypoxic conditions was more pronounced in DLD1/IP(3)R3_del cells than in DLD1 cells. These results clearly show that IP(3)R3 has proliferative and antiapoptotic effect in tumor cells, on contrary to the pro-apoptotic effect of IP(3)R1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available