4.8 Article

Competitive removal of Pb2+ and malachite green from water by magnetic phosphate nanocomposites

Journal

WATER RESEARCH
Volume 150, Issue -, Pages 442-451

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.11.057

Keywords

Magnetic phosphate nanocomposites; Selective removal; Simultaneous removal; Mechanism; Water treatment

Funding

  1. Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation of China [SBK2017020336]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [KYZ201747]
  3. National Natural Science Funds of China [51402153]
  4. National Science Foundation
  5. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [NSF-EF0830117]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The competitive removal of Pb2+ and malachite green (MG) from water by three magnetic phosphate nanocomposites (Fe3O4/Ba-3(PO4)(2), Fe3O4/Sr-5(PO4)(3)(OH), and Fe3O4/Sr5xBa3x(PO4)(3)(OH), namely FBP, FSP, and FSBP, respectively) was systematically investigated compared with Fe3O4 (F) nanoparticle. Temperature and adsorbent dosage for competitive removal were optimized to be 20 degrees C and 0.05 g in 50 mL. The kinetic and isothermal adsorption results were fitted well with the pseudo-second-order model and Langmuir model, respectively. In the competitive removal process, FSP showed a high affinity to Pb2+ (202.8 mg/g) while FBP possessed high selectivity for MG (175.4 mg/g), and FSBP was effective at simultaneous removal of Pb2+ and MG, with a capacity of 143.7 and 90.9 mg/g, respectively. The magnetic contents in nanocomposites allow magnetic separation of materials from the water after treatment. We proposed that the simultaneous removal mechanism by FSBP was due to ion exchange between Pb2+ and Sr2+ in the lattice and then the formation of hydrogen bonds between PO43- outside the material's surface and positively charged hydrogen in MG. This study indicates the potential of these phosphate nanocomposites to be used as effective materials for selective or simultaneous removal of Pb2+ and MG from water. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available