4.7 Article

Optimization of the integral valorization process for orange peel waste using a design of experiments approach: Production of high-quality pectin and activated carbon

Journal

WASTE MANAGEMENT
Volume 85, Issue -, Pages 202-213

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.12.029

Keywords

Integral valorization; Orange peel; Pectin; Activated carbon; Physicochemical characterization

Funding

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, Mexico (CONACYT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to optimize the integral valorization of orange peel waste by obtaining activated carbon after a process of pectin recovery in recycling of orange peel by transformation to value-added products of pectin extraction and activated carbon preparation. The study was supported by statistical analysis, and the significant factors and optimal conditions were obtained from the statistical analysis. Using a representative sample of orange peel waste, a yield of 29.37% pectin was recovered at the optimal operating conditions (phosphoric acid as the extraction agent, 95 degrees C as the impregnation temperature and a 2-hour extraction time). Activated carbon (AC) was prepared from the remaining solid residue. The conditions that improve the resulting material quality were H3PO4 [0.6 M] used as the activating agent, an impregnation temperature of 95 degrees C, a carbonization temperature of 400 degrees C and 1 h of carbonization time. The obtained AC showed a sorption capacity of 2342.91 mg g(-1), a value higher than that reported for commercial activated carbon. Using a model dye chemical, the sorption kinetics and thermodynamics of AC were found to follow a pseudo-second-order rate and the Freundlich models, respectively. Using the process conditions obtained in this study, it was possible to optimize the yield and also obtain good-quality products from valorization of orange peel. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available