4.6 Article

Hot deformation behavior and microstructure evolution of Ti-6Cr-5Mo-5V-4Al alloy during hot compression

Journal

VACUUM
Volume 160, Issue -, Pages 171-180

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2018.11.032

Keywords

Ti-6Cr-5Mo-5V-4Al alloy; Hot compression tests; Arrhenius constitutive model; Strain rate sensitivity; Temperature sensitivity; Intrinsic hot workability

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51575067]
  2. graduate research and innovation foundation of Chongqing, China [CYB18007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The true stress strain curves of Ti-6Cr-5Mo-5V-4Al alloy at the deformation condition range of 963-1113 K & 0.001-1 s(-1) were acquired by hot compression tests carried out on a Gleeble-3500 isothermal simulator. The higher softening values in the alpha + beta phase field reveal the occurrences of dynamic recrystallization (DRX) and dynamic globularization (DG), and the lower softening values in the beta phase field reveal that dynamic recovery (DRV) predominates. The constitutive relationships of this alloy in alpha + beta phase field and beta phase field were developed based on an improved Arrhenius model. The strain rate sensitivities (m) were determined and the temperature sensitivities (theta) were calculated by a modified function. The stacking contour map consisted of temperature sensitivity, strain rate sensitivity and microstructures at the strain of 0.9 was developed. By comparing the relationship between the three factors, the deformation defects are risky to occur at the deformation condition with high theta-value (> 0.5) and low m-value (< 0.17) and reasonable microstructure could be obtained at the condition with low theta-value (< 0.4) and reasonable m-value (> 0.2). Based on the obtained criterions, an optimal working area map was constructed, which is beneficial for intrinsic hot workability identification for this alloy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available