4.4 Article

Plasma microRNAs Predict Chemoresistance in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer

Journal

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1533033819828709

Keywords

metastatic breast cancer; miRNA; plasma; predictive; chemoresistance

Categories

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology [2013CB531202]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81502586]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: MicroRNAs contribute to chemotherapy response in different types of cancer. We hypothesized that plasma miRNAs are potentially associated with chemotherapy response in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods: Fourteen candidate microRNAs were chosen from the literature, and their plasma levels were measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Forty metastatic breast cancer patients were chosen as the training groups. The potential significant microRNAs were validated in another 103 plasma samples. Results: In the training set, we identified 3 microRNAs (miR-200a, miR-210, and miR-451) as significantly dysregulated miRNAs between sensitive group (partial response (and stable disease) and resistant group (progressive disease). Then, in the validation set, miR-200a (area under the curve = 0.881, sensitivity = 94.1%, specificity = 76.7%) and miR-210 (area under the curve = 0.851, sensitivity = 88.2%, specificity = 72.1%) showed high diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing sensitive group from resistant group. Furthermore, the plasma level of miR-200a was significantly associated with the stage in surgery (P = .035), and the high level of miR-210 expression was associated with internal organ metastasis (liver, lung, and brain; P = .024). Conclusions: Plasma miR-200a and miR-210 could be effective biomarkers for the prediction of chemotherapy resistance in metastatic breast cancer patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available