4.6 Review

Assessing patients' experiences of cancer care across the treatment pathway: a mapping review of recent psychosocial cancer care publications

Journal

SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages 1997-2006

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-04740-1

Keywords

Cancer; Oncology; Psycho-oncology; Psychosocial care; Quality of health care; Review

Funding

  1. Cancer Council New South Wales Program Grant [PG16-09]
  2. Cancer Council NSW [CSR 11-02]
  3. Hunter Medical Research Institute (HMRI)
  4. Australian Research Council Discovery Early Career Research Award [DE150101262]
  5. Australian National Breast Cancer Foundation [PF-16-011]
  6. NHMRC-ARC Dementia Research Development Fellowship
  7. University of Newcastle/Hunter Cancer Research Alliance Research Scholarship
  8. Hunter Cancer Research Alliance Implementation Science Flagship Program as part of the 2017 and the 2018 Research Higher Degree Award initiative
  9. Australian Research Council [DE150101262] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposePatients are a critical source of information about the quality of the components of cancer care that contributes to optimal psychosocial outcomes. Recently published research was examined to determine the: (1) proportion of studies that examined at least one of 14 components of cancer care, (2) the proportion of studies that included multiple components of care, and (3) the phase of the cancer care pathway in which data collection occurred (i.e. pre-, during and post-treatment).MethodsMEDLINE was searched to retrieve all data-based publications indexed for two international psychosocial cancer care journals (Supportive Care in Cancer and Psycho-Oncology) over a 2-year period. A total of 333 publications yielded 214 eligible publications that were assessed against the 14 components of care for which measurement by healthcare providers at multiple phases during cancer care is recommended. Publications were coded based on the: (1) specific component/s of care focused upon in the research, (2) number of components examined and (3) timing of data collection.ResultsThe most frequently assessed component of care was physical and psychosocial screening (n=198, 93%). Most studies (n=187, 87%) examined a single component of care. No studies assessed all 14 components. Only seven studies (2.1%) examined components of care across multiple phases of the care pathway.ConclusionsRecently published studies have examined limited segments of patients' experiences of cancer care. To improve psychosocial outcomes among people living with and beyond cancer, there should be a greater focus on patients' experiences across multiple components and the whole care pathway.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available