4.2 Article

Laboratory Foamed-Cement-Curing Evolution Using CT Scanning: Insights From Elevated-Pressure Generation

Journal

SPE DRILLING & COMPLETION
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages 81-91

Publisher

SOC PETROLEUM ENG
DOI: 10.2118/194007-PA

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Computed-tomography (CT) scanning has become a mainstay among scientists (Wildenschild and Sheppard 2013) because it enables nondestructive observation of material processes and formation in real time. Foamed cement is a high-strength, low-density material containing nitrogen gas, and is used to stabilize wellbore casings both onshore and offshore. In-situ foamed cement is subject to pressure changes because the slurry is pumped downhole and cures at depth. To correlate the influence of pressure to the gas-void size and the curing evolution of a foamed cement, two laboratory foamed cements were generated and CT scanned as they cured. One cement was generated following the American Petroleum Institute (API) industry standard API RP 10B-4 (2015) at atmospheric conditions using a blender, and the other cement was created using a foamed-cement generator (FCG) (resembling that of de Rozieres and Ferriere 1991) to produce a sample at an elevated pressure. FCG-generated cement qualities (in the range of 20, 25, 30, 35, and 40%) were scanned at their cured state for comparison. From the CT-image time series and the single FCG scans, the volumetric void properties were characterized and compared. The time-series blender voids were an order of magnitude larger than the FCG voids, and void growth was stagnant after a curing period of 100 minutes, whereas the FCG voids gradually increased in volume after 100 minutes. The Hsti-Nadai plots (Brandon 1995) reveal that the FCG and blender voids are weakly prolate, and all FCG voids, regardless of generation quality, relax to a greater final-magnitude strain than the blender voids. These findings confirm that both the void size and the curing process are influenced by the pressure at which a foamed cement is generated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available