4.5 Article

Phenotypic variation and biomass partitioning during post-flowering in two common bean cultivars (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under

Journal

SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
Volume 121, Issue -, Pages 98-104

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2018.10.031

Keywords

Common bean; Phaseolus vulgaris; Phenotyping; Remobilization; Stay-green; Water restriction

Categories

Funding

  1. COLPOS
  2. Catedras-CONACyT program and Infrastructure Project CONACyT, INFRA-2015 [256307]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is a major source of dietary protein and minerals in Latin America and Africa. Drought causes severe losses in the yields of many common bean cultivars. In this study, to obtain phenotypic variation over time on common bean under water restriction, we used a phenotyping platform with a sensor for visible (RGB). We hypothesized that greenness identification or stay green by high-throughput images is an efficient indicator for identifying differences among the common bean phenotypes. Plants of cultivars V8025 and Canario-60 under greenhouse conditions were irrigated to field capacity until the beginning of the seed-filling stage. Under well-watered conditions, whole plant senescence differed between the cultivars. V8025 seemed to maintain a constant green color throughout the evaluation, whereas the Canario-60 began to show yellowing at 24 d into the evaluation. Images showed early strong symptoms of senescence in the V8025 plants under water restriction; even significant necrosis was observed. In contrast, Canario-60 showed fewer symptoms of senescence than V8025 for half of the evaluations. Although both cultivars showed low yield under water restriction, the Canario-60 seed weight increased significantly. We suggest a non-invasive framework for using an image-based phenotyping platform for common bean screening under stress conditions. (C) 2018 SAAB. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available