4.5 Article

Impact of tillage intensity on clay loam soil structure

Journal

SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 388-399

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/sum.12501

Keywords

air permeability; specific energy input; structural stability; tillage intensity control

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soil structure and structural stability are key parameters in sustainable soil management and optimum cropping practices. This study aimed to improve the knowledge of potential precision tillage practices by characterizing the effect of varied tillage intensities on structural properties of a clay loam soil. An experiment with seedbed preparation was conducted using a power take-off-driven rotovator equipped to measure torque and angular velocity and with operational speed (OS) and rotational speed (RS) as main factors. Effects of soil coverage prior to tillage and wheeling directly after tillage were measured at one combination of OS and RS. The soil was sampled at 0-80 mm depth. Under slow OS (2.9 km hr(-1)) compared with fast OS (6.3 km hr(-1)), specific energy input was greater (116 and 52 J kg(-1) on average, respectively), and it increased with RS. Wheeling resulted in larger aggregate diameter right after tillage (at T1; 56 mm as geometric mean compared with 9 mm), with 42 times smaller geometric mean of air permeability 45 days after tillage (at T2) and with greater soil dispersibility at T2. Highly significant correlations were observed between soil dispersibility and energy input, specific surface area of aggregates, fractions of small (<4 mm) and medium (8-16 mm) aggregates, and geometric mean diameter. Slow OS combined with fast RS showed significantly greater air permeability than all other treatments. The results suggest that there is a potential for controlling soil structure in seedbed preparation by minimizing compaction from traffic and adapting site-specific control of rotovation intensity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available