4.6 Article

An improved epsilon constraint-handling method in MOEA/D for CMOPs with large infeasible regions

Journal

SOFT COMPUTING
Volume 23, Issue 23, Pages 12491-12510

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-019-03794-x

Keywords

Constrained multi-objective evolutionary algorithms; Epsilon constraint handling; Constrained multi-objective optimization; Robot gripper optimization

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61300159, 75661473241, 61332002]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [SBK2018022017]
  3. Hong Kong, Macao & Taiwan Science and Technology Cooperation Innovation Platform in Universities in Guangdong Province [2015KGJH2014]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M571751]
  5. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province of China [2013B011304002]
  6. Educational Commission of Guangdong Province of China [2015KGJHZ014]
  7. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [NZ2013306]
  8. Guangdong High-Level University Project Green Technologies for Marine Industries
  9. Scientific Startup Research Foundation of Shantou University [NTF12024]
  10. State Key Lab of Digital Manufacturing Equipment Technology [DMETKF2019020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes an improved epsilon constraint-handling mechanism and combines it with a decomposition-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA/D) to solve constrained multi-objective optimization problems (CMOPs). The proposed constrained multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (CMOEA) is named MOEA/D-IEpsilon. It adjusts the epsilon level dynamically according to the ratio of feasible to total solutions in the current population. In order to evaluate the performance of MOEA/D-IEpsilon, a new set of CMOPs with two and three objectives is designed, having large infeasible regions (relative to the feasible regions), and they are called LIR-CMOPs. Then, the 14 benchmarks, including LIR-CMOP1-14, are used to test MOEA/D-IEpsilon and four other decomposition-based CMOEAs, including MOEA/D-Epsilon, MOEA/D-SR, MOEA/D-CDP and CMOEA/D. The experimental results indicate that MOEA/D-IEpsilon is significantly better than the other four CMOEAs on all of the test instances, which shows that MOEA/D-IEpsilon is more suitable for solving CMOPs with large infeasible regions. Furthermore, a real-world problem, namely the robot gripper optimization problem, is used to test the five CMOEAs. The experimental results demonstrate that MOEA/D-IEpsilon also outperforms the other four CMOEAs on this problem.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available