4.8 Article

The Effect of Materials Architecture in TiO2/MOF Composites on CO2 Photoreduction and Charge Transfer

Journal

SMALL
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201805473

Keywords

CO2 reduction; heterojunctions; metal-organic frameworks; photocatalysis; titanium dioxide

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Science Research Council through the First Grant scheme [EP/N024206/1]
  2. Imperial College London
  3. Royal Society [RSG\R1\180434]
  4. Royal Society of Chemistry
  5. EPSRC [EP/N024206/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CO2 photoreduction to C-1/C(1+ )energized molecules is a key reaction of solar fuel technologies. Building heterojunctions can enhance photocatalysts performance, by facilitating charge transfer between two heterojunction phases. The material parameters that control this charge transfer remain unclear. Here, it is hypothesized that governing factors for CO2 photoreduction in gas phase are: i) a large porosity to accumulate CO2 molecules close to catalytic sites and ii) a high number of points of contact between the heterojunction components to enhance charge transfer. The former requirement can be met by using porous materials; the latter requirement by controlling the morphology of the heterojunction components. Hence, composites of titanium oxide or titanate and metal-organic framework (MOF), a highly porous material, are built. TiO2 or titanate nanofibers are synthesized and MOF particles are grown on the fibers. All composites produce CO under UV-vis light, using H-2 as reducing agent. They are more active than their component materials, e.g., times more active than titanate. The controlled composites morphology is confirmed and transient absorption spectroscopy highlights charge transfer between the composite components. It is demonstrated that electrons transfer from TiO2 into the MOF, and holes from the MOF into TiO2, as the MOF induces band bending in TiO2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available