4.7 Article

Screening of worldwide cowpea collection to drought tolerant at a germination stage

Journal

SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE
Volume 247, Issue -, Pages 107-115

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.11.082

Keywords

Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.; Drought stress; Seed germination; Seedling growth; Proline determination

Categories

Funding

  1. EUROLEGUME project
  2. European Union [613781]
  3. FEDER/COMPETE/POCI - Operational Competitiveness and Internationalization Programme [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006958]
  4. FCT - Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology [UID/AGR/04033/2013, UID/AGR/04046/2013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Global warming has an increasing impact on the availability of water for agriculture. Crops tolerant to high temperatures and drought, such as cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.), have an added value in the near future. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of drought on seed germination and seedling emergence of cowpea genotypes, in order to screen the most tolerant genotypes. Seeds from 58 cowpea genotypes all over the world were submitted to two stress conditions, induced by PEG-6000 (corresponding to osmotic potentials of -0.75 bars and -1.5 bars). Germination and seedling growth parameters, vigor index and proline content were determined to assess drought tolerance. The results revealed significant differences of all parameters among genotypes after treatments and interaction of both. Water stress caused a general decrease in germination and seedling growth, while an increase in proline content was observed. A high variation of drought responses were detected among genotypes, being possible to select seven genotypes (C11, C18, C44, C46, C47, C50 and C54) as tolerant to drought at germination stage. These results will be useful to select the best suitable parents for insertion in future breeding programs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available