4.8 Article

Suppressing fatty acid uptake has therapeutic effects in preclinical models of prostate cancer

Journal

SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 11, Issue 478, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aau5758

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia [PCFA-NCG 3313]
  2. Diabetes Australia Research Trust
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [APP1077703, APP1143224, APP1102752, APP1121057]
  4. Victorian Cancer Agency [MCRF15023]
  5. Department of Health and Human Services acting through the Victorian Cancer Agency [MCRF16007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metabolism alterations are hallmarks of cancer, but the involvement of lipid metabolism in disease progression is unclear. We investigated the role of lipid metabolism in prostate cancer using tissue from patients with prostate cancer and patient-derived xenograft mouse models. We showed that fatty acid uptake was increased in human prostate cancer and that these fatty acids were directed toward biomass production. These changes were mediated, at least partly, by the fatty acid transporter CD36, which was associated with aggressive disease. Deleting Cd36 in the prostate of cancer-susceptible Pten(-/-) mice reduced fatty acid uptake and the abundance of oncogenic signaling lipids and slowed cancer progression. Moreover, CD36 antibody therapy reduced cancer severity in patient-derived xenografts. We further demonstrated cross-talk between fatty acid uptake and de novo lipogenesis and found that dual targeting of these pathways more potently inhibited proliferation of human cancer-derived organoids compared to the single treatments. These findings identify a critical role for CD36-mediated fatty acid uptake in prostate cancer and suggest that targeting fatty acid uptake might be an effective strategy for treating prostate cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available