4.7 Article

Redefining the climate niche of plant species: A novel approach for realistic predictions of species distribution under climate change

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 671, Issue -, Pages 1086-1093

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.353

Keywords

Climate change compensation; Network-like climate niche; Non-parametric Bayesian network; North America; Reverse climate simulations; Silene acaulis L

Funding

  1. Qatar Petroleum [QUEX-ESC-QP-RD-18/19]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFA0606100]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Climate change is increasingly affecting plant species distributions, in ways that need to be predicted. Here, in a novel prediction approach, we developed the relevant climate niche (RCN) of plants, based on thorough selection of climate variables and implementation of a non-parametric Bayesian network for climate simulations. The RCN was conditionalized to project the fate of Silene acaulis in North America under moderate (Representative Concentration Pathway 4.5; RCP4.5) and extreme(RCP8.5) short-term (2011-2040) climate scenarios. We identified a three-variable climate hypervolume for S. acaulis. Within 20 years >50% of current locations of the species will be outside the defined climate hypervolume. It could compensate for climate change in 2011-2040 through a poleward shift of 0.97 degrees C or an upshift of 138 m in the RCP4.5 scenario, and 1.29 degrees C or 184 m in the RCP8.5 scenario. These results demonstrate the benefits of redefining the climate niche of plant species in the form of a user-defined, data-validated, hierarchical network comprising only variables that are consistent with species distribution. Advantages include realism and interpretability in niche modeling, and new opportunities for predicting future species distributions under climate change. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available