4.7 Article

Pollution characteristics of ambient PM2.5-bound benzo[a]pyrene and its cancer risks in Beijing

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 654, Issue -, Pages 735-741

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.085

Keywords

PM2.5-bound B[a]P; Average daily dose; Lifetime cancer risk; Exposure factors; Age sensitivity factors

Funding

  1. Public Welfare Research Program of the National Health Commission of the People's Republic of China [201402022, 201502003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to reveal the pollution characteristics of ambient PM2.5-bound benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) in Beijing and to assess the lifetime cancer risk from respiratory pathway exposure. The average daily dose was evaluated by the annual concentrations of ambient PM2.5-bound B[a]P, combined with Chinese human exposure factors and the age sensitivity factors. The 70-year lifetime cancer risks of different groups were assessed by the exposure assessment and stochastic analysis method recommended by California Environmental Protection Agency. The groups were divided by age and gender. The results showed that the ambient PM2.5-bound B[a]P concentration during the cold season was 15.7 times greater than that during the warm season in Beijing. The annual average concentrations of PM2.5-bound B[a]P in outdoors and indoors were 1.67 ng/m(3) and 1.04 ng/m(3), respectively, which exceeded the limit of Chinese National Ambient Air Quality Standard. The cancer risks of PM2.5-bound B[a]P in males, females, and the general population were 9.085 x 10(-6), 8.050 x 10(-6), and 8.740 x 10(-6), respectively. The cancer risk constituent ratios of ambient PM2.5-bound B[a]P in early life (516 years of age) for males, females, and the general population were 70.9%, 71.4%, and 713%, respectively. The males' cancer risk of PM2.5-bound B[a]P in Beijing was higher than that of the females. The early life cancer risk exposure to PM2.5-bound B[a]P should be paid more attention. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available