4.7 Article

Recycling rainwater by submerged gravity-driven membrane (GDM) reactors: Effect of hydraulic retention time and periodic backwash

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 654, Issue -, Pages 10-18

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.068

Keywords

Gravity-driven membrane filtration; Rainwater treatment; Soluble organic substances; Hydraulic retention time; Periodic backwash

Funding

  1. Economic Development Board (EDB) of Singapore

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rainwater recycling has been considered as an alternative cost-effective decentralized water supply. The low cost and effective gravity-driven membrane (GDM) filtration technology has been introduced to treat the rainwater prior use. In this study, we investigated the effects of hydraulic retention time (HRT; 27 h, 51 h, and 156 h) and periodic backwash durations (2 min, 5 min, 10 min, and 30 min per 2-3 days' filtration) on the permeate quality, flux and fouling mechanism in lab-scale submerged GDM reactors. Compared to the performance at HRT of 51 h (40% of DOC removal and similar to 2.9 L/m(2) h), better permeate quality and higher membrane flux were achieved at HRT of 27 h (51% of DOC removal and similar to 4.2 L/m(2) h) and 156 h (48% of DOC removal and similar to 5.0 L/m(2) h). Although the hydraulically reversible resistance was predominant (up to 90% of the total fouling resistance), the permeate flux could not be fully recovered by periodic backwash, regardless of the backwash durations. After several filtration-backwash cycles, the stabilized flux of GDM reactor with backwash was even worse than those without backwash. However, no correlation can be established between the stabilized flux (i.e., cake layer resistance) and the soluble organics and microbial cells in the cake layer of the GDM system during rainwater treatment. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available