4.7 Article

Storylines of combined future land use and climate scenarios and their hydrological impacts in an Alpine catchment (Brixental/Austria)

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 657, Issue -, Pages 746-763

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.077

Keywords

Mountain hydrology; Regional catchment; Land use; Climate change; Numerical modelling; Story line development

Funding

  1. Austrian Climate Research Program of the Austrian Climate and Energy Fund [STELLA KR13AC6K11109]
  2. Bavarian State Ministry of the Environment and Consumer Protection StMUV [BIAS II TKP01KPB-66747]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, the hydrological impacts of future socio-economic and climatic development are assessed for a regional-scale Alpine catchment (Brixental, Tyrol, Austria). Therefore, coupled storylines of future land use and climate scenarios were developed in a transdisciplinary stakeholder process by means of questionnaire analyses and interviews with local experts from various relevant societal sectors. Resulting future land use maps for each decade were used as spatial input in the hydrological model WaSiM, to which a new module for the consideration of snow-canopy interaction processes has been added. Simulation results for three developed storylines, each combined with a moderate (A1B) and an extreme (RCP8.5) climate future, show that in a warmer and dryer climate the amount of annual simulated streamflow at the gauge of the catchment undergoes a significant eduction, The (mainly natural) reforestation of the catchment - caused by abandonment of previously cultivated areas - leads to additional losses of water by enhanced interception and evapotranspiration processes. Further cultivation of the current mountain pasture areas has a certain potential to attenuate undesirable long-term impacts of climate change on the catchment water balance. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available