4.7 Article

Is China's coastal engineered defences valuable for storm protection?

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 657, Issue -, Pages 103-107

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.409

Keywords

Hard engineered defences; Seawalls; Mitigate damage of storm; Service valuation; Regression model; Economic damage; Coastal wetlands; Costal storm protection

Funding

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC41371483]
  3. National Taiwan University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

China has a long history of building hard engineered coastal defences for storm protection, which enables us to examine the economic effects of the hard engineering to mitigate storm damage. Examining historical storm impacts between 1989 and 2016, a significant negative relationship exists between the relative economic damages (Le., TD/GDP) by storm and the length of existing hard engineering within the storm swath. This indicates that hard engineered defences play a critical role in storm mitigation. We estimated that the storm protection value provided by hard engineered defences in China is CNY 3.18 million/km [US$0.50 million/km] on average, with a median of CNY 1.69 million/km [US $027 million]. They provide an annual economic value of CNY 6.04 billion on average. Despite their great contribution to reduce total economic damages from storms, hard engineered defences are not as efficient as coastal wetlands. Coastal wetlands are more cost effective based on comparison from China and USA. This study highlights the need for the Chinese government to transfer focus from prevailing hard engineered defences to ecosystem-based measure or the combination of both measures to prevent storm damage in the future. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available