4.7 Article

Flows, stocks, and emissions of DEHP products in Japan

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 650, Issue -, Pages 1007-1018

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.077

Keywords

di(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate; Flows; Stocks; Emissions; MFA; LCIA

Funding

  1. Ministry of Environment, Japan [1-1501]
  2. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The usage of products containing Bis (2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate (DEHP) is widespread, mainly through the great variety of PVC products. However, DEHP has become a worldwide concern, due to the potential health and environmental risks it presents. In this study, material flow analysis and emission estimations for DEHP products in Japan, from 1948 to 2030, were performed. Moreover, an evaluation of the potentially damaging impacts on human health and the environment was completed through a lifecycle impact assessment approach. The analysis focused on three representative lifecycle phases - Production, Use and Treatment and Disposal. The peak flows of DEHP from Production to the Use phase were in 1996 with 285,300 tons for shipment and the stocks peaked in 2001 with 1,981,908 tons. Accordingly, in 2006 the peak of DEHP waste to the Treatment and disposal phase was 190,792 tons. The primary emissions were observed in the Use phase, due to the large stocks, with DEHP mostly being released to the pedosphere. The total emissions from the Use phase reached the maximum of 48,960 tons in 2000, whereas in the Production and Treatment and disposal phase it was 248 tons and 15 tons, respectively. Subsequently, concerning the evaluation of impacts, the damage to the human health was the most widespread impact, totaling 13,782 disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), compared with the damage to the ecosystems, with 0.12 species.year. Furthermore, the risk-risk tradeoffs between the lifecycle phases were clarified throughout the years. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available