4.6 Article

Effects of dimensional wall temperature on velocity-temperature correlations in supersonic turbulent channel flow of thermally perfect gas

Journal

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11433-018-9318-4

Keywords

direct numerical simulation; velocity-temperature correlation; supersonic flow; channel flow; thermally perfect gas; strong Reynolds analogy

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11502236, 51536008, 91852203]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0401200]
  3. Science Challenge Project [TZ2016001]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LQ16E090005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Direct numerical simulations of temporally evolving supersonic turbulent channel flows of thermally perfect gas are conducted at Mach number 3.0 and Reynolds number 4800 for various values of the dimensional wall temperature to study the influence of the latter on the velocity-temperature correlations. The results show that in a fully developed turbulent channel flow, as the dimensional wall temperature increases, there is little change in the mean velocity, but the mean temperature decreases. The mean temperature is found to be a quadratic function of the mean velocity, the curvature of which increases with increasing dimensional wall temperature. The concept of recovery enthalpy provides a connection between the mean velocity and the mean temperature, and is independent of dimensional wall temperature. The right tails of probability density function of the streamwise velocity fluctuation grows with increasing dimensional wall temperature. The dimensional wall temperature does not have a significant influence on the Reynolds analogy factor or strong Reynolds analogy (SRA). The modifications of SRA by Huang et al. and Zhang et al. provide reasonably good results, which are better than those of the modifications by Cebeci and Smith and by Rubesin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available