4.8 Article

Single-cell profiling identifies myeloid cell subsets with distinct fates during neuroinflammation

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 363, Issue 6425, Pages 365-+

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.aat7554

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Sobek Foundation
  2. Ernst-Jung Foundation
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (Reinhart-Koselleck-Grant) [SFB 992, SFB1160, SFB/TRR167]
  4. Ministry of Science, Research and Arts, Baden-Wuerttemberg (Sonderlinie Neuroinflammation)
  5. European Union [607962]
  6. Bundesministerium fur Bildung, Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie (BMBF)
  7. DFG [GR4980]
  8. Behrens-Welse-Foundation
  9. Max Planck Society
  10. DFG grant KIDGEM [SFB 1140]
  11. Centre for Biological Signalling Studies (BIOSS) [EXC294]
  12. European Research Council (ERC) [337689]
  13. European Research Council (ERC) [337689] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The innate immune cell compartment is highly diverse in the healthy central nervous system (CNS), including parenchymal and non-parenchymal macrophages. However, this complexity is increased in inflammatory settings by the recruitment of circulating myeloid cells. It is unclear which disease-specific myeloid subsets exist and what their transcriptional profiles and dynamics during CNS pathology are. Combining deep single-cell transcriptome analysis, fate mapping, in vivo imaging, clonal analysis, and transgenic mouse lines, we comprehensively characterized unappreciated myeloid subsets in several CNS compartments during neuroinflammation. During inflammation, CNS macrophage subsets undergo self-renewal, and random proliferation shifts toward clonal expansion. Last, functional studies demonstrated that endogenous CNS tissue macrophages are redundant for antigen presentation. Our results highlight myeloid cell diversity and provide insights into the brain's innate immune system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available