4.7 Review

Utilization of red mud in road base and subgrade materials: A review

Journal

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING
Volume 141, Issue -, Pages 187-199

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.031

Keywords

Red mud; Alkaline; Pollution; Utilization; Subgrade; Road base

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51574024, 51604026, U1760112]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Red mud is highly alkaline slurry produced during alumina extraction from bauxite. Its disposal generates serious environmental pollution. The best way to solve red mud disposal issues is to develop economic utilization technologies that consume significant amounts of red mud. This paper reviews the possibility of utilizing red mud as a road base material, weak subgrade soil stabilizer as well as a subgrade material. Results showed that red mud can be used for those purposes. It was also found that the stabilizing content needed to meet a certain standard differs due to differences in requirements from one country to another. Therefore, there is a need to design proportions with UCS, CBR, leaching characteristics required by the country in which red mud is intended for use. The effect of various stabilizers on performance of red mud is discussed and it transpired that lime showed the best performance followed by dolime fine, ground granulated blast furnace slag, cement kiln dust and fly ash. Findings indicated that red mud shows better performance as a subgrade material than natural soil. Also the synergistic use of red mud and other wastes also improves the mechanical and durability properties of the material compared with using red mud alone. Based on mechanical, economic and environmental benefits, it is recommended to use red mud in road base structure rather than in subgrade despite higher red mud consumption in subgrade than in road base. The scope for future research in this area is also suggested.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available