4.7 Review

Establishment of enhanced geothermal energy utilization plans: Barriers and strategies

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 132, Issue -, Pages 19-32

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.126

Keywords

Enhanced geothermal system; Key performance indicators; Strategic environmental assessment; Comprehensive performance evaluation; Chingshui geothermal field; Business model

Funding

  1. Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) of Taiwan (ROC) [EPA-103-FA16-03-D024]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) of Taiwan (ROC) [MOST 107-3113-E-007-002]
  3. Foundation of Fujian Science and Technology Committee for University, China [JK2016023]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Geothermal energy has received tremendous attention as a largely untapped renewable resource that does not produce significant CO2 emissions during electricity generation. Worldwide installed capacity of geothermal energy plants has reached 14.3 GWe in 2017. However, widespread adoption of geothermal technologies should consider its potential environmental impacts. In this study, we first review the current state-of-the-art enhanced geothermal systems around the world, especially the United States, Philippines, Indonesia, Turkey and New Zealand. Then, we address the challenges and barriers to its adoption from the institutional, regulatory, technological and financial aspects. We also propose several strategies to implement geothermal energy plans, including (1) establishment of clear national energy utilization policies, (2) consolidation of geothermal laws and regulations, (3) engagement in geothermal potential assessment and periodic maintenance services, and (4) provision of fiscal incentives, financial supports and guarantees. Finally, we illustrate the implementation plans and business model of enhanced geothermal system deployment to conduct a demonstration plan for geothermal energy utilization. A case study of geothermal utilization in Taiwan, i.e., the Chingshui geothermal field, was discussed. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available