4.8 Review

Cryogenic-based CO2 capture technologies: State-of-the-art developments and current challenges

Journal

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 101, Issue -, Pages 265-278

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.018

Keywords

CO2 capture utilization and storage; Cryogenic; Cold energy; Energy consumption; Efficiency

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21878228, 51506147]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin City [17JCQNJC08500]
  3. Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by Tianjin City [TJSQNTJ-2017-03]
  4. Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment [2015ZX07306001-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CO2 capture, utilization and storage has been recognized as a primary option to mitigate the issue of climate change caused by the utilization of fossil fuels. Several CO2 capture strategies have been developed, such as absorption, adsorption, membrane, chemical looping, hydrating and biofixation. Among different technologies, particular attention has been given to cryogenic CO2 capture by phase change. The aim of this study is to improve interest in cryogenic technologies for CO2 capture by providing an overview of the actual status of CCS. To reach this goal, the major strategies and technologies for CO2 capture from fossil fuel combustion have been reviewed. Simultaneously, the characteristics of cryogenic technologies for CO2 capture are summarized. The existing challenges that need to be overcome in cryogenic technology include cold energy sources, capture costs and impurities, etc. Finally, opportunities for the future development of cryogenic-based technologies are discussed. The results of this investigation indicated that cryogenic CO2 capture processes can be easily retrofitted to the existing industrial emission facilities and avoid the challenges associated with chemical solvents or physical sorbents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available