4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Modifying a clinical linear accelerator for delivery of ultra-high dose rate irradiation

Journal

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
Volume 139, Issue -, Pages 40-45

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.01.031

Keywords

FLASH; Ultra-high dose rate; Linac; Irradiation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to modify a clinical linear accelerator, making it capable of electron beam ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) irradiation. Modifications had to be quick, reversible, and without interfering with clinical treatments. Methods: Performed modifications: (1) reduced distance with three setup positions, (2) adjusted/optimized gun current, modulator charge rate and beam steering values for a high dose rate, (3) delivery was controlled with a microcontroller on an electron pulse level, and (4) moving the primary and/or secondary scattering foils from the beam path. Results: The variation in dose for a five-pulse delivery was measured to be 1% (using a diode, 4% using film) during 10 minutes after a warm-up procedure, later increasing to 7% (11% using film). A FLASH irradiation dose rate was reached at the cross-hair foil, MLC, and wedge position, with >= 30, >= 80, and >= 300 Gy/s, respectively. Moving the scattering foils resulted in an increased output of >= 120, >= 250, and >= 1000 Gy/s, at the three positions. The beam flatness was 5% at the cross-hair position for a 20 x 20 and a 10 x 10 cm(2) area, with and without both scattering foils in the beam. The beam flatness was 10% at the wedge position for a 6 and 2.5 cm diametric area, with and without the scattering foils in the beam path. Conclusions: A clinical accelerator was modified to produce ultra-high dose rates, high enough for FLASH irradiation. Future work aims to fine-tune the dose delivery, using the on-board transmission chamber signal and adjusting the dose-per-pulse. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available