4.8 Article

Phasor histone FLIM-FRET microscopy quantifies spatiotemporal rearrangement of chromatin architecture during the DNA damage response

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1814965116

Keywords

chromatin organization; fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy; DNA repair; spatiotemporal correlation spectroscopy; Forster resonance energy transfer

Funding

  1. Cancer Council NSW
  2. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
  3. Australian NHMRC [APP1059278, 1053195, 1106241, 1104461, APP1104461, APP1124762]
  4. Australian Research Council (ARC) [CE140100011, LP140100967]
  5. National Institutes of Health [P41-GM103540, P50-GM076516]
  6. Cancer Council NSW [RG 15-12]
  7. Cancer Institute NSW [11/FRL/5-02]
  8. ARC [DP180101387]
  9. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1106241, 1104461] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To investigate how chromatin architecture is spatiotemporally organized at a double-strand break (DSB) repair locus, we established a biophysical method to quantify chromatin compaction at the nucleo-some level during the DNA damage response (DDR). The method is based on phasor image-correlation spectroscopy of histone fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM)-Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET) microscopy data acquired in live cells coex-pressing H2B-eGFP and H2B-mCherry. This multiplexed approach generates spatiotemporal maps of nuclear-wide chromatin compaction that, when coupled with laser microirradiation-induced DSBs, quantify the size, stability, and spacing between compact chromatin foci throughout the DDR. Using this technology, we identify that ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and RNF8 regulate rapid chromatin decompaction at DSBs and formation of compact chromatin foci surrounding the repair locus. This chromatin architecture serves to demarcate the repair locus from the surrounding nuclear environment and modulate 53BP1 mobility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available