4.8 Article

Convergent gene losses illuminate metabolic and physiological changes in herbivores and carnivores

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1818504116

Keywords

convergent gene loss; herbivorous diet; carnivorous diet; metabolism; physiology

Funding

  1. Computer Service Facilities of the Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics
  2. Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems
  3. Max Planck Society
  4. German Research Foundation [HI1423/3-1]
  5. Leibniz Association [SAW-2016-SGN-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The repeated evolution of dietary specialization represents a hallmark of mammalian ecology. To detect genomic changes that are associated with dietary adaptations, we performed a systematic screen for convergent gene losses associated with an obligate herbivorous or carnivorous diet in 31 placental mammals. For herbivores, our screen discovered the repeated loss of the triglyceride lipase inhibitor PNLIPRP1, suggesting enhanced triglyceride digestion efficiency. Furthermore, several herbivores lost the pancreatic exocytosis factor SYCN, providing an explanation for continuous pancreatic zymogen secretion in these species. For carnivores, we discovered the repeated loss of the hormone-receptor pair INSL5-RXFP4 that regulates appetite and glucose homeostasis, which likely relates to irregular feeding patterns and constant gluconeogenesis. Furthermore, reflecting the reduced need to metabolize plant-derived xenobiotics, several carnivores lost the xenobiotic receptors NR1I3 and NR1I2. Finally, the carnivore-associated loss of the gastrointestinal host defense gene NOX1 could be related to a reduced gut microbiome diversity. By revealing convergent gene losses associated with differences in dietary composition, feeding patterns, and gut microbiomes, our study contributes to understanding how similar dietary specializations evolved repeatedly in mammals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available