4.7 Article

Effect of sodium silicate on the magnetic separation of ilmenite from titanaugite by magnetite selective coating

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 344, Issue -, Pages 233-241

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2018.12.026

Keywords

Magnetite selective coating; Hydrophobic attraction; Sodium silicate; Ilmenite; Titanaugite

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [N160103004]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M611249]
  3. Open Project Program of the State Key Laboratory of Vanadium and Titanium Resources Comprehensive Utilization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Surface magnetization provides a possible approach for recovering weak or non-magnetic minerals via magnetic separation. In the present study, magnetite selective coating was used to enlarge the magnetic difference between ilmenite and titanaugite and further separate them. During this process, the selective coating behavior of magnetite was investigated with sodium silicate depressant and sodium oleate surfactant on mineral surfaces. The SEM analysis and magnetic separation results revealed that magnetite displayed a selective coating behavior on the surface of ilmenite and titanaugite, resulting in a large recovery difference by approximately 53% between them. The results of zeta potential and adsorption measurements indicated that sodium silicate preferred to adsorb onto titanaugite surfaces and prevented sodium oleate adsorption but not on ilmenite. Contact angle analysis suggested that the selective adsorption of reagents led to the hydrophobic difference of minerals. EDLVO calculation results illustrated that hydrophobic attraction dominated the selective adhering behavior of magnetite on ilmenite and titanaugite. After magnetite coating, the magnetic separation recovery and TiO2 grade of artificial mixtures were increased by approximately 2633% and 4.7%, respectively. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available