4.7 Article

Effects of droplet formation patterns on the atomization characteristics of a dust removal spray in a coal cutter

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 344, Issue -, Pages 570-580

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2018.12.021

Keywords

Coal dust; Atomization characteristics; External spray; Nozzle distribution device; Formation patterns; Coal cutter

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018BSCXB01]
  2. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [KYCX18_1912]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To improve the coverage of an external spray in a coal cutter and enhance the coal dust capture efficiency, the atomization characteristics of a dustproof spray were investigated using a self-constructed experimental system by considering different droplet formation patterns. In addition to the droplet diameter, the spray solution consumption, droplet number density and atomization angle were used to more comprehensively analyze the effects of spray pressure and nozzle structure on the atomization characteristics. It was found that the spray field formed by a nozzle with a 1.5 mm outlet diameter and a spray pressure of 5 MPa, had the optimal atomization characteristics, i.e. the droplet diameter was not significantly reduced over 5 MPa, while the solution consumption was optimal (7.69 L/min) at an outlet diameter of 1.5 mm. Droplet diameters were slightly reduced as the solution surface tension decreased. A novel nozzle distribution device, with two nozzles (the optimal distance between them was 15 cm), was designed and installed on the rocker arm of a coal cutter, enhancing the coverage of the dust removal spray. Field application verified that compared to a traditional spray, the total dust and respirable dust control efficiency of the optimized spray field were enhanced by over 8%, effectively improving the working environment in the underground coal mine. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available